On Wednesday, June 9, 2010, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, I saw upgrades fail repeatedly, and William was writing here
> that -upgrade is basically not ready
> for prime time use.
>
> Indeed, one needs to have at least an spkg dependencies mechanism in
> place, before -upgrade
> can be done in a fool-proof way. At the moment it is adhoc - an spkg
> can be checking that another spkg is there and has version at least
> something, but this is not supported in any consistent way, e.g. like
> it is done with Debian packages.
> I.e. there is no declarative facilities in place that would allow one
> to specify such an interdependency,
> they rather need to be hard-coded into the spkg install script.
>

False.  For the 99 standard spkg's, the dependencies are declared in
spkg/standard/deps, which is a makefile.


> So one needs to develop/adopt such a scheme, before -upgrade can be
> made safe...
> And I imagine replies here saying that it would increase the
> complexity of Sage, without adding any new useful functionality.
> I can only say that in the long term it would save developers time, to
> have such a scheme in place...
>
> Dima
>
> On Jun 9, 11:10 am, David Kirkby <david.kir...@onetel.net> wrote:
>> On 6 June 2010 11:47, François Bissey <f.r.bis...@massey.ac.nz> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >> On 06/ 6/10 10:53 AM, François Bissey wrote:
>> >> >>> You could also try
>>
>> >> >>>     sage -ba
>>
>> >> >>> which will rebuild from scratch all Cython code.
>>
>> >> >> OK I will give it a go.
>>
>> >> > No improvement. I am considering this upgrade officially failed
>> >> > on my machine.
>>
>> >> > Francois
>>
>> >> Can anyone tell me what happens in a 'sage -upgrade'? I'm puzzled why this
>> >> can't be made to work. I would have thought as a minimum one would need to
>>
>> >> 1) Rebuild any new standard packages.
>> >> 2) Rebuild any standard package which depends on another package which has
>> >> been upgraded.
>> >> 3) Rebuild the library.
>>
>> >> Is '(2)' being done? If not, I suspect it would be more reliable.
>> > I would think it is done that way. Although sometimes there are 
>> > difficulties.
>> > It's possible that I didn't actually found the right culprit in this case.
>> > pynac only depends on python so there's not much to rebuild.
>> > The list of updated package is very short so this is puzzling but bugs
>> > in upgrading system happen. Possibly in this case something went subtly
>> > wrong from 4.4.1->4.4.2->4.4.3
>>
>> It just that
>>
>> a) Permitting upgrades, rather than a total reinstall, was a good idea
>> of William's. (At least I think it was his idea. If not, I apologise
>> to whoevers idea it was).
>> b) It sometimes fails, which makes it far less useful.
>> c) When it does fail, you end up with a screwed up installation of Sage.
>> d) Other projects seem able to manage upgrades. I've never had an
>> upgrade of Firefox or Thunderbird fail, despite I allow automatic
>> updates.
>>
>> I've had updates of OpenSolaris fail, but in that case it does at
>> least clone the boot environment first, so if the upgrade fails, one
>> just picks the previous entry on the grub menu, and one goes back to
>> the previous version of the operating system. The system is
>> unavailable for only the time it takes to reboot. twice - first to the
>> failed installation, then back to the previous installation. One can
>> continue to use the operating system during the upgrade, just as one
>> can with Windows live updates.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> Dave
>
> --
> To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
> sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
> URL: http://www.sagemath.org
>

-- 
William Stein
Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to