On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Dr. David Kirkby <david.kir...@onetel.net> wrote: > There seems to be an agreement to include GLPK, but as I noted elsewhere, > the package does not build properly on 64-bit Solaris, as the right compiler > flag (-m64) does not get added. Robert created a ticket for this.
Thanks so much for looking into this. > > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9312 > > The spkg-install and SPKG.txt are a bit odd, so I'm trying to sort them out. > > SPKG.txt says: > > --------------------------------------------------------- > == License == > > The GLPK package is part of the GNU project, released under the aegis of > GNU. > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > but src/COPYING is clearly GPL 3 > > GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE > Version 3, 29 June 2007 > > > Are GPL3 packages allowed as standard, rather than just optional? I thought > there were a no-no. Yes, they are allowed. We already ship *many* GPL3 standard packages. > Assuming the license is not an issue, is there a reason to use version 4.42, > when 4.44 is the latest? (Both versions are GPL 3). I don't know of one. > > > > Dave > > -- > To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to > sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel > URL: http://www.sagemath.org > -- William Stein Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
