On 15 July 2010 18:15, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 7:14 PM, <drkir...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Jul 15, 2010 4:55pm, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:51 PM, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > On Jul 15, 6:34 am, Robert Miller r...@rlmiller.org> wrote: >>> >>> >> PS --- Let's be sure to check "deps" to make sure that gfan has all >>> >>> >> its dependencies, since we have recently jumbled that file around. >>> >>> > >>> >>> > The "deps" for gfan hasn't changed since 4.3.4.alpha1 (the oldest >>> >>> > version I have on this computer). >>> >>> >>> >>> This doesn't prove anything, unfortunately. For example with the >>> >>> "fortran on OS X" issue we just fixed, the fortran deps line hadn't >>> >>> changed, but by luck the problem hadn't happened before, since -- >>> >>> purely by luck -- fortran always get built after python. >> >> >> That's not true. > > Ugh.
Read the rest of my email. It may be true on your OS X box, but it is certainly not true in general. >> Usually on my system, fortran built well before python. >> However, since I have a working version of python on the system the lack of >> a python in Sage did not matter. >> >> I think the build order will be alphabetical on serial builds, in the >> absence of stated dependencies - see my post on sage-devel. I suspect with a >> lot of new dependencies added recently, the build order is changing a lot. >> >> Dave Dave -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
