On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 08:25:33PM +0100, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> On 09/ 6/10 01:46 PM, Fran?ois Bissey wrote:
>> On the other hand there is a real problem, I think, in the way libcblas.so
>> and liblapack.so are generated in sage as their production often fails.
>
> Are you sure it is libcblas.so that's presenting problems and not
> libf77blas.so?
>
> As far as I can tell:
>
>  * On both Solaris and Linux, liblapack.so are *not* generated properly.
>  * On Linux, libf77blas.so is *not* generated properly.  (That's ok on 
> Solaris)
>
> This makes me question whether we should be generating the shared 
> libraries at all. If that rather inappropriately named script 
> 'make_correct_shared.sh' does not work, why the hell should we be using 
> it?

I haven't followed the rest of the thread very closely, but doesn't #9600
address the issue with make_correct_shared.sh?

-Willem Jan

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to