Another documentation / doctest patch which could do with a review: * #9359 http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9359, get number field doctest coverage up to 100%
This adds several files in number fields to the reference manual, and adds lots of missing doctests. Any takers? David On 21 Sep, 07:42, Minh Nguyen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > We have three documentation tickets that should be easy to review: > > * #9850http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9850, make style of > documentation consistent with sagemath.org > > * #9936http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9936, add > sage.symbolic.function_factory to the reference manual > > * #8825http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8825, Improve > documentation for function norm > > The latter ticket is an attempt to make the documentation more useful > by adding suggestions for related commands. In this case the command > in question is norm(). The idea of adding suggestions for related > commands can be found at this AskSage thread: > > http://ask.sagemath.org/question/116/development-of-help-files > > If you have some suggestions for commands related to a specific > command, please open a ticket and list those related commands. Thank > you very much for improving the user friendliness of the Sage > documentation. > > -- > Regards > Minh Van Nguyen -- To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
