> Hi all, > > I am a bit puzzled by something I noticed while looking at problem > with sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/tests/parigp.py" > in sage-on-gentoo and followed the upstream thread > (http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1079) > We include the patch for issue 1079 as is from the thread, including in > 1079_part2.patch: > --- src/basemath/polarit3.c > +++ src/basemath/polarit3.c > @@ -2536,6 +2536,8 @@ END: > if (plambda) *plambda = lambda; > if (LERS) > { > + if (typ(H0)==t_INT) H0 = scalarpol(H0,vY); > + if (typ(H1)==t_INT) H1 = scalarpol(H1,vY); > *LERS = mkvec2(H0,H1); > gerepileall(av, 2, &H, LERS); > return H; > > > ============= > But upstream says this about it in the follow up: > 2) Your patch is correct in essence, but set those polynomials to the > wrong variable (vY instead of vX). I have committed the fix. > > Could someone tell me if what is in the spkg shipped in 4.6alpha2 is > correct or if we have forgotten to do something? I actually changed the > patch locally from vY to vX and I have run "make test-all" successfully (I > have all the data sets in the proper place to do that), including > rnfkummer. > > I'd like to know before opening a new issue on trac or not. >
Ouch that hurts! pari-2.4.3_svn12577.p7 contains modified sources without the corresponding files in the patch folder: src/basemath/buch2.c src/test/*/rnfkummer Just a note that the files should be pulled by svn update in spkg-make. Francois -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
