On 2010-10-06 10:30, John Cremona wrote: > Perhaps Jeroen's main point is that it is supposed to be > always possible to find out ow something is implemented using ??, but > in some cases like this that's not possible -- instead you do have to > know more about the structure of the Sage library. That wasn't really my main point (I actually want to find the source of the == operator because I found a bug(*)). But of course you are right, it would be nice if ?? would always give useful information (but that's probably not easy to do).
Jeroen. (*) I am working on improving (essentially rewriting) the interrupt handling in Sage, see #9678. As an important part of this effort, I have written code to test interrupt handling, see #10030. For the moment, I have fixed some missing _sig_off's in #10061. I know there is a missing _sig_off in the L == R code for matrices. -- To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
