On Oct 22, 3:52 am, mmarco <mma...@unizar.es> wrote:
> I have observed the following behaviour:
>
> sage: var('a,b,c,d,r,s,t,x,y')
> sage: assume(s,'real')
<snip>Can you construct a simpler example which still exhibits this behavior? That might help a little. > > All the stuff about real_part(s) and imag_part(s) should not appear. > Is it broken? I don't know that it's more broken than before, but it's possible that our assumption system hasn't told Maxima in this case to assume s is real for purposes of the real_part function, or that Maxima ignores this. As I say above, a simpler example would be easier to try in "pure" Maxima and to see what happens there if one assumes s is real. - kcrisman -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
