> > Regarding fortran, for a "Microsoft Visual C++" version of Sage, I > > will just get rid of Fortran (and Lisp) entirely, and not bother with > > building anything currently in Sage that depends on them... > > My thoughts about fortran oscillate as well. If I have the option, I > try to just use Python + Cython. >
For current Sage needs, though, the reason for Fortran is Scipy and R, correct? (Maybe PolyBoRi?) Though I also note http://www.sagemath.org/doc/numerical_sage/f2py.html refers to another cool %magic thing. Just checking. - kcrisman -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
