Hi, First of all let me say that I am currently writing a math text book where I am using a lot of sagetex and I think it is a great package!
Having said that as a "user" I am a bit concerned that the syntax of sagetex is going to change if I want to publish the latex sources or describe examples in a book as this would lead to frustration with outdated code examples (books do not tend to be as often updated as software unfortunately :-). I would think that other people writing books may have similar issues. Could I therefore suggest to either change the syntax really soon or not at all, I personally do not care how I am accessing sagetex functionality and it is at best irrelevant syntactic sugar to the user. regards Jens On Sep 27, 4:44 am, Dan Drake <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 at 05:15AM -0700, Volker Braun wrote: > > As for the environment names, right now there is: > [...] > > I think ideally they would all be combined into a single "sage" > > environment, with options that determine whether to typeset the sage > > command, the sage output, and whether to doctest. By default, it would > > then behave like sagecommandline does now. > > After I wrote my message, I realized that yes, all the "sage*" > environments could perhaps be unified. Your idea of one environment that > takes options is a good one. > > Dan > > -- > --- Dan Drake > ----- http://mathsci.kaist.ac.kr/~drake > ------- > > signature.asc > < 1KViewDownload -- To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
