On Tuesday, December 7, 2010, Dan Drake <dr...@kaist.edu> wrote:
> Count me as another person really excited about the automatic trac
> ticket test bot. It's great work. Good job, Robert!
>
> First, my proposal: we should call that bit of software "patchbot",
> since it automatically deals with patches; the other buildbot
> (http://build.sagemath.org/sage/) takes tarballs and builds them. Having
> two completely distinct services both called "buildbot" is confusing. I
> propose "patchbot". Thoughts?

i propose  "tracbot"

>
> Second, I have two patches on a ticket
> (http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10440); one gets applied to
> the Sage library, the other to the scripts repo. How do I tell
> what-we-currently-call-buildbot where to apply patches?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Dan
>
> --
> ---  Dan Drake
> -----  http://mathsci.kaist.ac.kr/~drake
> -------
>

-- 
William Stein
Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to