On 28 Jan., 13:27, Simon King <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Robert, > > On 28 Jan., 11:14, Robert Bradshaw <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Yep. It's sad when sometimes it's quicker to not cache non-trivial > > computations. > > Indeed it was. Here is an example from the ticket: > ... > Hence, due to the optimisation of accessing the cache, it is now > quicker to compute the values *and* store them in the cache (the non- > critical path) than it used to be to only get the cached values that > have been computed before (the critical path).
Oops, bad example (it isn't actually computing something). Anyway, the speed-up is visible. -- To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
