On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 7:46 AM, David Kirkby <david.kir...@onetel.net> wrote: > On 26 February 2011 14:31, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 2:56 AM, Volker Braun <vbraun.n...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Its true that its nice to have the university backing. But depending on how >>> much overhead the University charges this may or may not be a cost-effective >>> way of running things. I take it that they take far less than the usual rate >>> (40%?) from private donations? >> >> The Univ of Washington charges 0% overhead (so absolutely nothing!) on >> private donations and also on donations from companies. >> >> They charge 56% overhead on certain parts of NSF grants. They charge >> 56% overhead on most other grants. >> >> -- William > > 56% is high. At UCL it was 40%.
Are you drawing a conclusion from a sample size of 2? William -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
