Hi Gustavo, On 9 Mrz., 12:22, Gustavo de Oliveira <[email protected]> wrote: > Test output: > > sage -t "devel/sage/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py" > ********************************************************************** > File "/home/goliveir/local/sage-4.6.2/devel/sage/sage/rings/ > number_field/number_field.py", line 2964: > sage: K.selmer_group([K.ideal(2, -a+1), K.ideal(3, a+1), > K.ideal(a)], 3) > Expected: > [2, a + 1, a] > Got: > [2, a + 1, -a]
Both answers are correct. However, that test is pretty annoying, since apparently the exact result is pretty much machine dependent. At ticket #2329 the outcome of this test is therefore declared as "random". It would be good to have a test that does not depend on the choice of one correct answer. Best regards, Simon -- To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
