On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Tom Boothby <[email protected]> wrote: > 2011/3/9 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade > <[email protected]>: > >> But I did not account: >> Releases >> - Your releases are only in an encapsulation format that you invented. >> [ +100 points of FAIL ] >> (( spkgs )) > > To be fair, .spkg == tar.bz2, so these hundred points are unfair.
Which is why he didn't count them. Of course most of those points would be big negative marks against any distribution system, and they should all be taken with a boulder-sized grain of salt. I think we have more than enough "points of success" to counter out these "points of fail." :-) > 2011/3/9 William Stein <[email protected]>: >> I'm glad I didn't read and believe that webpage in 2004, or there >> would be no Sage. > > +1 +1 - Robert -- To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
