that s probably the reason. i was aware too late of the dependencies field.
On Jun 8, 6:08 pm, Robert Bradshaw <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Robert Bradshaw > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Paul-Olivier Dehaye > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all > >> I was looking at the patchbot for my patches, and looking at the > >> results for ticket 11442, I was a bit puzzled. > > >>http://sage.math.washington.edu:21100/ticket/11442/ > > >> This happens because the bot picked up the dependency on #11440 (as > >> instructed), but not the dependency on #11300, which comes from > >> #11440. This should really have worked (At least that part...) because > >> #11440 applies cleanly on its own. Am I supposed to recursively list > >> all dependencies? Isn't this something that should be picked up by the > >> bot? > > > Hmm... this should have been picked up. I don't yet pick up if the > > dependent ticket got updated though, I should probably do that. > > FYI, it seems to have picked it fine in my tests now. Perhaps ticket > #11440 was changed after ticket #11442 was tested or something? > > - Robert -- To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
