On 8/17/11 10:40 AM, Ivo Hedtke wrote:
Am 17.08.2011 um 17:36 schrieb Jason Grout:
One conclusion: we should make Sage's matrix command accept a string like the
above example and parse it as matlab would.
+1
Another option is to make the preparser recognize syntax like:
[1 2 3; 4 5 6; 7 8 9]
or even
[A B; C D]
for making a matrix by stacking and concatenating matrices.
I don't know how strong of a case we could make for such a preparser
change, though. It'd have to have lots of support before it would even
be considered seriously.
Jason
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
