On Nov 15, 5:34 pm, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Bill Janssen <bill.jans...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Nov 15, 1:02 pm, "Georg S. Weber" <georgswe...@googlemail.com> > > wrote: > >> Some people buidling > >> Sage from source do *want* a libjpeg on their system to be taken into > >> accont by their PIL in Sage! > > > Really? Do you have user studies or other evidence of that I could > > look at on that? It's surprising to me; I'd think that one build of > > libjpeg would be much like any other build. > > Georg surely just meant that with the current setup where libjpeg is > not included in Sage, they would want PIL to be able t use libjpeg if > they have it installed on their system. Of course if you include > libjpeg in Sage, then this argument vanishes.
So are you not-so-subtly hinting that http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7344 should be a standard spkg? Just checking. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
