On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 05:51, David Kirkby <david.kir...@onetel.net> wrote: > > > On 9 February 2012 12:59, R. Andrew Ohana <andrew.oh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 01:56, David Kirkby <david.kir...@onetel.net> >> wrote: >> >> > There are a lot of packages in Sage which don't respect CC. I've fixed >> > some >> > of them, but gave up at some point as there were too many. Is is funny, >> > as >> > there are the odd package which has in it. >> >> I have found every one of these cases while working on the clang port, >> and have fixed every one -- many of these have tickets linked to >> #12426. There are a few that I haven't gotten around to making tickets >> yet, but that is mainly because I haven't started looking at the >> package in much depth. >> > > I've created a lot of them. It would be wise to check yours against some of > mine, as you might have created duplicates. All these are ones I've > discovered, but have NOT fixed. If you have fixed any of these, then they > can be closed. > > palp > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7071 > > tachyon > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7069 > > sympow > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7066
You should check to see if the above two are still valid issues, they both respect CC=clang. > > ratpoints > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7038 > > ATLAS > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7048 > > f2c > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7027 > > flint > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7024 > > I suspect I have others too I've created, but don't have time to look. > > It will be intersting to try with the Sun compiler once you have fixed > these. I suspect that will fail on a lot of code gcc/clang accepts. This may take a bit, and may not be entirely possible without the help of upstream for some packages (I'm looking at atlas specifically, but there may be others as well). Some of the patches I'm creating are big enough that they probably should go into upstream as well. > (I know > clang is stricted than gcc, but I think it aims to be gcc compatible, > whereas the standard Sun compiler implements the C standard, although Sun > produce a front end that takes gcc code and then compiles it with the Sun > compiler > > Dave > > -- > To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to > sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel > URL: http://www.sagemath.org -- Andrew -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
