Hi Dima,

On 3 Mrz., 11:27, Dima Pasechnik <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> I reported this on sage-release already, and Jeroen is taking care of
> it.

I see #11754, but this is only taking care of the README and
__init__.py file in this particular case.

But what about my second point?

I suggest to add a new method sage.misc.hg.HG.local_changes(). It is
supposed to return names of all modified tracked files, and of all new
untracked files that are either .py or .pyx (if I am not mistaken, .c
and .cpp and .h files can appear during compilation, I had a "core"
file in devel/sage, ..., that's why I suggest the restriction to
new .py and .pyx files).

That new method should then have a doc test
 sage: hg_extcode.local_changes()
 []
 sage: hg_root.local_changes()
 []
 sage: hg_sage.local_changes()
 []
 sage: hg_sagenb.local_changes()
 []
 sage: hg_scripts.local_changes()
 []

Do you think this would be a good idea?

Cheers,
Simon

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to