On 2012-04-16 19:47, Simon King wrote: > Hi Jason, > > On 16 Apr., 19:35, Jason Grout <[email protected]> wrote: >> If we do that, then we should definitely make the notebook not dependent >> on the optional spkg or pyopenssl. Otherwise we have this weird >> situation where a standard package depends on an optional package. > > I think we could live with that situation. It is similar to what > happens with gcc Not really, as GCC is a *standard* package (shipped with Sage), while openSSL would be an *optional* package (not shipped with Sage).
-- To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
