On May 2, 3:43 pm, Jeroen Demeyer <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2012-05-02 21:18, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:> Would it be fair to say 
> that the optional packages should be considered
> > unreliable?
>
> Indeed.  That could be one of the reasons they are considered "optional".

Though some optional packages are very good.  Do you have a list of
which ones you installed?  Some would probably be pretty easy to rule
out, and this should be documented in that test or fixed.

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to