On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:07:59PM +0200, Jan Groenewald wrote:
>    Yes, the goal of this is definitely ease-of-use and to get the user
>    as quick and painless as possible into a fully featured sage on Ubuntu.
> 
>    FYI, I will probably update the AIMS PPA with Sage5 from binary,
>    but will continue to work on an open PPA for the community where
>    we can have a from-source package.
> 
>    Now, I have added gfortran, libgfortran3, and gcc as dependencies.
>    Do I need to update the gcc dependency to be build-essential?
> 
>    I was even considering making texlive-latex-recommended a dependency.
>    Even texmaker! Other candidates are currently recommended:
>    x-www-browser, openssh-client, texlive, imagemagick, ffmpeg, dvipng
>    The last few are recommended here for certain sage functionality:
>    http://www.sagemath.org/doc/installation/source.html
> 
>    (I'm causing rather large downloads for all users of this package!
>    I should probably aim for one update...)

Would it make sense to have two packages:

 - sage (the current package) with what's strictly needed to run sage
   as dependency:
    - libgfortran3
    - gfortran?
    - firefox or x-www-browser

 - sage-recommended, a dummy package with dependencies:
    - gcc, build-essential
    - texlive, texlive-latex-recommended, texlive-pictures (for tikz!)
    - imagemagick, ffmpeg, dvipng
    - openssh-client
    - an appropriate version of java for jmol

Cheers,
                                Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. ThiĆ©ry "Isil" <[email protected]>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to