Le dimanche 13 mai, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit: > On 2012-05-13 22:46, Keshav Kini wrote: > > Even more fundamentally, everything that we modify should be > > tracked by version control. The fact that we do not put src/ under > > revision control then directly implies that we should not touch it. > I disagee when it comes to removing parts of a spkg. Several packages > include only partial sources. They contain the upstream tree but with > some files/directories (which Sage doesn't need) removed. I think > this is fine and should be allowed. > > In the case of Pynac, the upstream version history in "src/.hg" serves > no purpose for Sage, so I would remove it.
I thought doing "make dist" gave clean sources, meaning it wouldn't contain everything in the repository (neither .hg, .git, .svn, .whatever, nor generated content, nor...). How was that src/ dir obtained if it contains a .hg? Snark on #sagemath -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
