Nathann Cohen <[email protected]> writes: > (and if I may interrupt, we also really need to be able to deal with > permutation groups on something *different* from 1...n, which is > GAP's choice. > And I know that I am the first one to complain about labels instead > of integers when it comes to a graph's vertices. > And I know that it is a nightmare to deal with it, everywhere in the > code. > Please, don't remind me. I feel guilty already. > > But it would be so nice to deal with permutation groups over > anything... > I knew it would be a bad idea to interrupt anyway. > > Have fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuunnnnn !!! )
Wasn't this supposed to be implemented by trac #10335? http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10335 -Keshav ---- Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net ! -- -- To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
