On Sunday, 29 July 2012 14:27:22 UTC+8, kfiz wrote: > > Am Samstag, 28. Juli 2012 12:36:38 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik: > > On Saturday, 28 July 2012 18:07:29 UTC+8, Andrea Lazzarotto wrote: > > > > > > 2012/7/28 Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> > > > > > > A workaround is to not to build "universal" libraries, i.. anything that > works on > > 32 as well as on 64 bit (i.e x86 and x86_64) systems. > > IIRC universal binaries should also include PPC. Am I right? > > > > > > > > well, it used to be the case. But with Xcode 3.2.6 one has to jump extra > hoops, and with Xcode 4 it seems to be impossible, as there is no OSX 10.5 > frameworks for Xcode 4. > > (Or maybe it's not quite true, as one can reuse Xcode 3 frameworks with > Xcode 4, but this is getting more an more unpleasant, AFAIK). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Andrea Lazzarotto - http://andrealazzarotto.com > > > Hmmm, that seems to exactly be my bug. Yes, Dima I downloaded Xcode > 3.2.6 from apple devel, but from page 4 of 7..? Are we refering to > different download sections? > So, what's the smartest thing to do here..smart meaning without to much > effort. ;-).
It could be that Sage is just not tested on your configuration, and you hit a real bug. I don't know. Do I get it right that you can't build the gcc that comes with Sage? -- -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
