On 29 August 2012 08:05, Jan Groenewald <j...@aims.ac.za> wrote: > The four (or six) volunteers are presumably adept at installing a machine, > adding > buildbot_slave and auto updates, and repsonding every few months to an > anomaly.
There could be a reasonable argument made for not updating them, except on the the deveopment version. If the idea is to have a range of different systems to test Sage on, then I think it would be best if they did not all have the same patches. Obviously if there were specific patches needed to build Sage, that would be desirable to have them. If a record was kept of exactly what updates were applied, and what were necessary, it would be possible to say to someone "You need patches X, Y and Z". Dave -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en.
