On 2012-11-19, Nils Bruin <nbr...@sfu.ca> wrote:
> On Nov 19, 6:22 am, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Perhaps the coersion system itself might be a bit confused, but
>> it looks like here we talk rigour for the sake of rigour, without
>> any benefits.
>
> One benefit is error detection and picking proper normalizations. For
> instance, if you create a "reduction map" from a projective variety to
> one over GF(p), denominators need to be cleared. First you need to
> clear them from the equations, but assuming you did that, it's also
> important that you properly clear denominators from the
> representatives for your projective points (i.e, the projective point
> (1:1/p) should be represented by (p:1) before it gets mapped over).
>
> However, projective points over Q usually do normalized with a 1 in a
> given coordinate, forcing denominators elsewhere. With an automatic
> coercion you may well succeed in defining a map, only to find it
> doesn't evaluate in points where you thought it should.

hmm, I don't think this example will fly. If you happen to have a
divisior of p in the denominator then you get a point with every 
nonzero coordinate divisible by p. So the reduction of it is
(0:0..:0) -- oeps --- a runtime error sowieso...

>
> Nasty complications with the coercion framework always happen a couple
> of levels removed from the source of the problems, so I've given up on
> only guarding against problems I can "imagine" and prefer the more
> defensive stance of sticking with what is mathematically guaranteed to
> work. If we ensure there are reasonable ways to loosen the stringent
> defaults I think we can still end up with a workable system.
>
>> Conceptually, field division is a partial map too.
>
> Yes, and it always is. So assuming it's not will surely be a bug.

Don't you think it's totally inconsequent that Sage 
can divide an element of GF(p) by an integer (and sometimes get a
runtime error, sure), but Sage cannot multiply by the inverse of this 
integer? This looks like a bug, actually, IMHO.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en.


Reply via email to