-1 -- sorry. If we must have a shorthand for log to base 2, isn't "lb" the canonical one?
Regards, David On 10 January 2013 09:45, Nathann Cohen <nathann.co...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hellooooo everybody ! > > I understand very well that asking questions like that can easily get me > killed by a crowd of angry mathematicians, but I just wondered.... > Given that ln(e)=1 is not ambiguous at all, what would you think of log(2) > = 1 ? :-P > > We would have ln(x) = log(x,e) and log(x) = log(x,2) ... > > .... and now can I run ? :-P > > Nathann > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en.
