> OK, that's what Robert did anyway, in #14073. He states there: "I don't >> think this code should go in unless it's clearly shown to be a problem." >> I guess that's a good idea. First wait if there is really a problem to >> fix. >> >> We could also include the code but somehow disabled, or commented out, so > that one who really wants it could easily enable it. >
If we wanted to go that route, my vote would be for a flag we can set at runtime or changes the compiled code, rather than commented out code. Best, Travis -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
