While we are at it, i think we also whould consider implementing ideals (and groebner basis and so on) for these rings. At the end of the day, they are quotients of polynomial rings, so it shoudn't be hard.
On 14 feb, 07:03, Simon King <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > On 2013-02-13, Andrew Mathas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > sage: 1/q is q^-1 > > False > > At least this answer is correct! Elements are not supposed to be unique. > > > In general, even basic arithmetic seems hazardous in this ring. > > > At last some of this seems to be addressed in > >http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11726. Does anyone know what the > > status of this is? > > Note #8972. I have the impression that both problems are related. > > Cheers, > Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
