Well *really* somebody should change Ring to not derive from parent_old.Parent. Somebody used both old and new parents as base to avoid having to do this.
On Thursday, February 14, 2013 1:15:24 PM UTC, Simon King wrote: > > sage: Ring.mro() > [<type 'sage.rings.ring.Ring'>, <type > 'sage.structure.parent_gens.ParentWithGens'>, <type > 'sage.structure.parent_base.ParentWithBase'>, <type > 'sage.structure.parent_old.Parent'>, <type > 'sage.structure.parent.Parent'>, <type > 'sage.structure.category_object.CategoryObject'>, <type > 'sage.structure.sage_object.SageObject'>, <type 'object'>] > > I think it *is* recommended to use Ring, isn't it? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
