I definitely like the idea of making our own series. On 3 jun, 20:22, David Kirkby <david.kir...@onetel.net> wrote: > On 6 May 2013 02:00, rjf <fate...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, May 2, 2013 1:27:30 PM UTC-7, William wrote: > > >> Hi Sage-Developers, > > >> There is a big series of small books about R that Springer publishes: > > >> http://www.springer.com/series/6991?detailsPage=titles > > >> The editorial director of that series at Springer just talked with me > >> on the phone for a while, and he says these are among "Springers best > >> selling books"; moreover, he believes they have a major impact on > >> making R a really viable platform for computational statistics. > > > Am I the only one who finds this implausible? > > Here's an article on R > >http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/07/technology/business-computing/07pro... > > and it doesn't mention Springer. > > No, you are not the only one to find it implausible - I was suspicious > of that claim the minute I read it. Then I looked at the link William > gave. The earilest of that series appears to be published in 2012, but > R has been popular and viable for a very long time - well before 2012. > > Dave
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
