On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 7:39 PM, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote: > Maybe we could have a criterion to decide what "obscure" is and some > examples?
Well, there are also other measurements you can take and mix together. e.g. how broadly the given constructor is developed, I mean, how many features are implemented or possible in general. Also, some time ago I created this statistical overview of the sagemath.org/doc pages. This is also some kind of indicator, which areas of Sage are of interest. http://sagemath.org/doc_stats.html (e.g. check out the "constructions" box) > > EllipticCurve, > > which I would argue should remain in the global namespaces... That sounds fine, also given that there are a lot of featurs for Elliptic curves, right? Harald -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
