Hi Nils, On 2014-02-04, Nils Bruin <[email protected]> wrote: > In http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15104, I am finding that by far the most > expensive part of taking the transpose of a (non-square) matrix is getting > your hands on the parent (at least for matrices over (smallish) finite > fields)
Do I understand correctly that #15104 is where you *found* the problem, while *fixing* it will be somewhere else? If you open a new ticket, please put me on Cc. I am sure the creation of transposed matrices can be accelerated. Best regards, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
