Setting aside the self-praise, the ego, and the non-open-source, it seems to me to be an entirely valid question as to how it stacks up against Sage as, say, a user experience, or a programming environment.
The central idea of the presentation seems to be the value of providing (or allowing) interactively the consistent manipulation of self-tagged objects in a library that can to grow without limit. Maybe also functional programming style. He totally downplays the underlyingl features of the language per se (as opposed to the library) which are much involved in pattern matching. So how does it stack up as (a) user experience? (b) programming environment? RJF -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
