I agree that it is tricky. There is no need to cache the unique output since it itself is cached by being unique. This is testable with some effort; in doctest mode the memoization decorators should performs some additional testing. Takes some work to write but no conceptual problem.
Also, I think that caches should age out eventually. This would also mitigate a lot of possible memleaks. Downside is of course that you might have to recompute intermediate results, but that is still better than being reaped by the OOM killer ;-) On Wednesday, April 23, 2014 11:02:04 PM UTC+1, Nathann Cohen wrote: > > Please guys.. Answer this thread, this is a bad problem. It is important > to do something about it... :-/ > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.