Dear all, in the finite_state_machine module there exist classes FSMState, FSMTransition, FSMProcessIterator. The process iterator is to be written new, see http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16538 Thereby, the following questions arose: What are the naming conventions here w.r.t. the prefix "FSM", i.e., is "ProcessIterator" or "FSMProcessIterator" better?
FYI: The mentioned classes are not in the gobal namespace (although, the original motivation for the prefix FSM was that the classes were in the global namespace. Cf. http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15078#comment:9 where it was suggested to avoid putting this into the global namespace) Best wishes Daniel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
