It would be annoying to me. Often times when I'm implementing a new feature, I don't have full doctest coverage. However when I make changes, I want to make sure the tests that I currently do have still work and don't want to be told that I don't have full coverage. The right tool for the right job, most multi/omni tools tend to make life more difficult.
Best, Travis On Monday, August 25, 2014 8:24:47 AM UTC-7, Nathann Cohen wrote: > > Hello everybody ! > > I just had to run "sage -coverage" a couple of times (it tells you if > some methods need doctests) and wondered if we should add this to the > output of "sage -t" ? > > This way we would get to see more often the list of functions which > need a doctest, and perhaps fix that faster. > > What do you think ? > > Have fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuun ! > > Nathann > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
