> In this case the list of no-sets is known from the start, and it is
> small. And the boolean function can be quickly evaluated. Clearly not
> what this function is meant to handle.

The list of *minimal* no-sets. In case  you would hold this against me.

Nathann

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to