In #16747, Karen Kohl and Laura Peskin proposed to include Fredrik Johansson's arb library as an optional package. I cleaned that up a little bit and set this to needs_review as I did not get any answers from the original authors.
As it is, #16747 simply adds the library and does not do anything with it, so no python bindings for the data types provided and so on. Is it sufficient as it is or is it required to do something useful with the library already in the initial ticket? In particular, this ticket currently does not have any doctests attached to it. In principle, I think that arb could be used to enhance the capabilities of real_interval_field_elements and so on. Regards, CH -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
