> Well, that's two people already... Yepyep.
> For the time being perhaps one can change the wording to indicate "only for > legacy packages, we expect new packages to be in this format". > > I have to say that needing a patch for ''every'' upgrade of a pkg is > annoying, sage -i should "just work". Also, I do not know myself how anybody who would like to distribute his own Sage package could do it (with the new style) without having to create a patch. Sebastien mentionned the checksum problem, but HE knows how to contribute to Sage if he needs to. If one does not, isn't it impossible to create a new style package to just share code with some persons ? To sum it up -> no patch to remove that doc. But this conversation raised some sensible issues. Nathann -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
