Here's an item that is related but far more edifying. http://norvig.com/lispy.html
I looked at the Hy documentation, and it appears that Hy hardly implements lisp. It alters the surface syntax of python to parenthesized prefix, and tosses in a very small subset of lisp. Hy resembles a 3-week project in a computer science compiler class. There is rarely a good reason to REWRITE parts of Sage in some language X. That is why I am concerned when someone proposes to REWRITE parts of Sage in Python. Rewriting pieces that exist in C, C++, Lisp... strikes me as makework projects that likely result in slow partial broken versions of working code. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
