On Tuesday, April 14, 2015 at 9:21:22 PM UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote: > > The output type control for "show" should be more about what the user > wants to achieve, not the technical minutiae of file type that can achieve > it. That is, "show" should be more about raster vs. vector graphics, lossy > vs. lossless compressed, raytraced vs. rasterized, .... >
I don't mind additional arguments with a higher level of abstraction. But if you want "show" as a preview to "save" (as in methods 3 and 4), then "show" should support all the options "save" does. So that when switching the method name we don't have to translate all the keyword arguments. I guess that when specific low-level format requirements are stated, then failing to satisfy them should be an error for the sake of simplicity and consistency, but on this point my opinion is not as strong as on supporting all "save" arguments for "show". -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
