[X] Yes, I want graphical user interfaces that make use of the graphical abilities
On Monday, May 4, 2015 at 11:32:53 AM UTC-7, Nathann Cohen wrote: > > Helloooooooooo, > > >> and any other representation of a graph is rather uninstructive >>> >> Err... Well. Try "graphs.RandomGNP(30,.5).show()" to get an idea of how > uninstructive a plot can be (compared to anything you might say on its, > diameter, degree distribution, planarity, etc...) :-P > I think that enough objects will look good that it will outweigh bad examples like this one, especially for beginning users. > Just to complete Volker's question: it is not only about graphs, but in > general about objects whose graphical representations "adds something" > (there is a Matrix.plot, but that's not the subject). > > The ticket at #18289 does the same for Posets, for Polyhedra, and more > will follow. His question is: "should it be the default behaviour, or only > something that can be enabled manually if desired?" > I think it's important that the method for changing the behavior is clearly documented, in any case. -- John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
