Hi Martin!
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 10:58:30AM -0700, 'Martin R' via sage-devel wrote:
> The sage class Homset is not really what I want, because it assumes
> that I can apply
> a morphism to an element of an object.
So far all our morphisms have indeed been functions between sets; so
it's well possible that Homset/Morphism have not yet been shaken
enough to be usable in a higher generality.
How strong is the above assumption? I mean, if you implement a stub
_call_ method, does it actually get called if you don't explicitly
use the morphism as a function?
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <[email protected]>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
