>From my point of view a fork - or better call it sequel - would be the best.
Unfortunately, all original developers like me went to industrial positions, which are completely unrelated to PolyBoRi or any kind of algebraic software. Meanwhile, family and the new jobs don't leave us time to work on pet projects. So, the real active branch is the ohanar github repository. At that repository, I already see great work in autotools support. I would adopt this for sure if I ever get the chance to get back to work on PolyBoRi. For the unlikely case of sudden freetime I would rather contribute to the new project than trying to resurrect the old one. ;-) However, to avoid confusion, you should rename your fork. Use TOSSFKAP or BRiAl or whatever you like to distinuish the projects. Also, I have to note, that in the autotools branch some headers from original Cudd were reintroduced. This might be a problem since some were intentionally left out due to unclear licenses. This had been suggested by the debian people some time ago. Best regards and good luck, Alexander -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
