> What is our politic about that? Should we force a patchbot green light with > respect to all optional packages?
A green patchbot is not exactly a requirement for a ticket to pass. It's more a help than anything else. You see what it says, act on that knowledge. > 1) the set of installed optional packages appear on the patchbot report. Note that you already see what optional package breaks since the broken doctest should have a # optional flag. Also, if you run tests with the latest Sage you will see the list of packages appear. Won't this appear on the patchbot too? ... Using --optional=bliss,cbc,cryptominisat,gcc,git_trac,modular_decomposition,mpir,nauty,plantri,python2,sage,scons,topcom ... > 2) Right now, patchbot are considered different if they run on different > architecture or OS. But if the optional packages installed differ this is > also a major difference, HMmmm... Wait 'till we actually have problems with that. Nathann -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
