Le 16/10/2015 11:20, Samuel Lelievre a écrit :
2015-10-12 22:45:08 UTC+2, Snark:
Le lundi 12 oct. 2015 à 13:02:38 (-0700), Volker Braun a écrit :
> On Monday, October 12, 2015 at 3:46:29 PM UTC+2, Snark wrote:
> >
> > Does that mean that the libgap in sagemath will get part of
upstream GAP?
> >
>
> A better interop between Sage and GAP is definitely desirable. I
don't
> think anybody has a clear plan at this point but I'll be at the
meeting ;-)
>
We are uncomfortable with packaging sage-the-distribution's libgap
in Debian,
because as the name doesn't say it's sage-specific, we might be in
some trouble
if GAP were to release a real-GAP libgap (even in some years...
Debian is about
long-term).
So if that lib could get upstream's blessing (or just get renamed
libsagegap),
that would make things easier.
See a discussion of that point on the gap development list at
https://mail.gap-system.org/pipermail/gap/2015-October/000176.html
Thanks!
Snark on #sagemath
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
