On Sunday, 13 December 2015 14:20:18 UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote: > > This is now https://github.com/sagemath/FlintQS > > On Sunday, December 13, 2015 at 1:11:06 AM UTC+1, Bill Hart wrote: >> >> It can still in theory fail to factor an integer, so don't rely on it too >> heavily for anything critical. In practice it's ok, but you know some >> people get a bit upset about things like that. >> > > You mean because its buggy, or because it uses a probabilistic algorithm, > or what? >
Because it's not designed to try again or increase parameters if it fails. QS is not guaranteed to find a factor. Bill. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
